But even gay marriage within the state would leave questions.
And they are at it again over the issue of gay marriage.
They were more likely than other age groups to support gay marriage.
Whether people are for or against gay marriage, everyone has a piece of this fight.
If you are against gay marriage, then don't have one.
I don't think the government should get involved in gay marriage.
The first public gay marriage was on March 7, 2004.
They too have a simple message: gay marriage is all about states' rights.
What did he think about the president's position on gay marriage?
I don't understand what the big deal is with gay marriage.
The same is true with the issue of same-sex marriage.
The country is still making up its mind about same-sex marriage.
Same-sex marriage is not in my opinion a human rights issue.
It was not until around the 21st century that public support for same-sex marriage began growing.
"This year it will be the same or higher because there is a lot of focus on same-sex marriage."
Beginning in the mid-1990s, the church began to focus its attention on the issue of same-sex marriages.
The bill passed and same-sex marriage will take effect on August 1st, 2013.
During the campaign, she indicated her support for same-sex marriage.
There is debate over the impact of same-sex marriage upon families and children.
Public support for same-sex marriage continued to grow in 2011.
Or maybe homosexual marriage will help give the word "wife" a meaning we can all live with, for the first time.
"This administration is dancing dangerously around the issue of homosexual marriage."
In the meantime, opponents of homosexual marriage are preparing for a fight.
When a country recognizes homosexual marriage, it has lost its basic sense of right and wrong.
Today, for the majority of the French, even homosexual marriage is no big deal.
The draft statement does not specifically recommend that the church allow homosexual marriage.
Two brief points; the first is the question of homosexual marriage, an issue that has been much discussed.
The second point I would like to challenge relates to the implicit recognition of homosexual marriage.
So we have to dig much deeper to answer the question whether there should be a constitutional right of homosexual marriage.
Nothing in the Constitution or its history suggests a constitutional right to homosexual marriage.
